Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandatory frequency airport: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Latest revision as of 22:48, 14 January 2026

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge with Air traffic control. This was written in 2006, but still no sourcing. Without sourcing, it’s difficult to understand the need for, or purpose of, a Mandatory frequency airport. — Maile (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Maile66. A Google search came up with some sources, but this topic does seem better suited as a section rather than a standalone article. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 03:53, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: and improve. If there was an article like Glossary of aviation terms that we could merge this with, then I could get behind that. As-is, it’s a concept that bears explaining. –DMartin (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Line 15:		Line 15:

	* ”’Merge”’ with [[Air traffic control]] – We don’t need a separate page for every single term and especially not one that doesn’t cite a single source. See also [[WP:NOPAGE]]. –[[User:Prothe1st\|Prothe1st]] ([[User talk:Prothe1st\|leave me a message]])– 20:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)		* ”’Merge”’ with [[Air traffic control]] – We don’t need a separate page for every single term and especially not one that doesn’t cite a single source. See also [[WP:NOPAGE]]. –[[User:Prothe1st\|Prothe1st]] ([[User talk:Prothe1st\|leave me a message]])– 20:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
			* ”’Comment:”’ I just so happened to come across this discussion while editing [[single frequency approach]] and that page is essentially in the same situation. So if you’re considering this page for deletion, you might want to take a look at that one as well. –[[User:Noha307\|Noha307]] ([[User talk:Noha307\|talk]]) 22:47, 14 January 2026 (UTC)