Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual and gender-based violence against Israeli hostages during the Gaza war: Difference between revisions

Sexual and gender-based violence against Israeli hostages during the Gaza war (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be a content fork. The material presented here is already fully covered in existing articles:

Sexual and gender-based violence in the October 7 attacks

Gaza war hostage crisis

The article does not present substantial new, independently notable information. Instead, it basically duplicates content that is already included in those pages, or that can be appropriately added to them alone, meaning it has issues meeting WP:NOTCONTENT, WP:UNDUE. Not only that but it seems to me to more specifically be a WP:POVFORK, functioning as a separate page for material that fits naturally within other, well-established articles, apparently for the purpose of emphasis. The presentation of the material as-is also does not, imo, adhere to WP:NPOV.

Because the article represents a redundant and non-notable fork, and because its content is more appropriately handled within the existing articles listed above, the article does not meet WP:GNG and I believe deletion is appropriate. Any verifiable, neutrally presented, policy-compliant information can of course be merged into the relevant parent articles where appropriate. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Israel, and Palestine. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination and Sexuality and gender. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There isn’t much to show a fork is needed, testimonies are fine, but the majority of the article now is these testimonies. We can merge relevant content into the articles as shown. Might be too soon as this hasn’t been studied much, but can be adequately explained in other articles. A testimonial section really only serves to shame the victims, something that can be briefly described in other articles without going into needless details. Oaktree b (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: clear content fork Laura240406 (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Unnecessary fork of content already covered in existing articles – Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]