Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U. G. Krishnamurti: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 9: Line 9:

:”’Note”’ that I happened to submit this for speedy deletion at the same time Chess enjoyer was making this nomination, so our apologies for the redundancy. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 23:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

:”’Note”’ that I happened to submit this for speedy deletion at the same time Chess enjoyer was making this nomination, so our apologies for the redundancy. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 23:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

::I have commented out the speedy deletion request. My reasoning had nothing to do with my estimation of the value of the article; it was instead that either the speedy deletion request or this AfD had to go, and that a canceled AfD would bring more confusion than would a canceled speedy request. — [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 01:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 01:16, 11 December 2025

U. G. Krishnamurti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t think the subject of this article passes our general notability guidelines, due to a lack of independent sources. All of the current references were either written by him, or those that knew him personally. A dilligence search found more of the same, although it’s possible that there are non-english sources that I missed. The article also has a promotional tone in my opinion, but that’s a surmountable problem, should the article survive this discussion. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I happened to submit this for speedy deletion at the same time Chess enjoyer was making this nomination, so our apologies for the redundancy. Athanelar (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have commented out the speedy deletion request. My reasoning had nothing to do with my estimation of the value of the article; it was instead that either the speedy deletion request or this AfD had to go, and that a canceled AfD would bring more confusion than would a canceled speedy request. — Hoary (talk) 01:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version