Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of people who died by being hit by a cow which got hit by a train and flew through the air whilst urinating on train tracks: Difference between revisions

Draft:List of people who died by being hit by a cow which got hit by a train and flew through the air whilst urinating on train tracks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Not suitable for wikipedia Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – This is such a hideously convoluted set of circumstances that a comedy writer would question who on earth would suspend their disbelief to buy this. Also, WP:BLP1E. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:18, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep – It’s a draft, and drafts are not deleted for notability, and drafts are not deleted for stupidity unless they have any of certain specified types of stupidity. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per above and WP:NDRAFT. – Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 23:05, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per NDRAFT. Just let the draft go undisturbed for a while and when it doesn’t get edited (I doubt many edits will happen to it due to the sheer specificity of the circumstances described in the title) the draft can be deleted automatically. Gommeh 📖   🎮 00:29, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:NDRAFT: If we just leave this alone, it will probably go unedited for six months and be eligible for G13. On the other hand, it could be expanded and eventually become a featured list! There’s no rush to delete it now. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:33, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. While this article doesn’t have a chance of meeting our notability in our current form, WP:NDRAFT and WP:NMFD are clear that notability guidelines don’t apply in draft space. If anything, let G13 take its course. ~ Matthewrb ^{Get in touch · Breadcrumbs} 06:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This draft does not meet notability requirements and should be deleted before the six months end.

Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don’t delete drafts for not meeting notability requirements in general, as it’s assumed that the draft can always be edited to meet notability standards later. If it doesn’t meet notability standards six months after it was created then the draft will get automatically deleted. Why do you think we should delete it before the six months are over? Gommeh 📖   🎮 14:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this draft is inappropriate for Wikipedia. And is this draft some kind of a joke? Catfurball (talk) 23:02, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting story, but it’s not a list. LDW5432 (talk) 02:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]