From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|
*ISSN use inconsistent |
*ISSN use inconsistent |
||
|
Thanks, <span style=”font-family:Georgia”>[[User:UpTheOctave!|<span style=”color:#204CCF”>UpTheOctave!</span>]] • [[User talk:UpTheOctave!|<span style=”color:#AC1B45″>8<sup>va</sup>?</span>]]</span> 00:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC) |
Thanks, <span style=”font-family:Georgia”>[[User:UpTheOctave!|<span style=”color:#204CCF”>UpTheOctave!</span>]] • [[User talk:UpTheOctave!|<span style=”color:#AC1B45″>8<sup>va</sup>?</span>]]</span> 00:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:Thank you {{u|UpTheOctave!}} I will address these tonight once I am home from work. Regarding the Mohr interview, it entirely could be copyvio without me being aware of it, I took it at the suggestion of the Russian Wikipedia’s example. Admittedly, I was not sure how to format that one, though I am sure it is reliable. As for ”Noisey”, it was an online music imprint of ”Vice”, a print magazine with editorial oversight. If the latter is the case, I find it unlikely the case should be any different with ”Noisey”. [[User:MFTP Dan|”'<small>mftp</small> <span class=”smallcaps” style=”font-variant:small-caps;”>dan</span>”’]] <sup> [[User talk:MFTP Dan|oops]] </sup> 13:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:47, 24 October 2025
I’ve listed this article for peer review because I intend to make a featured article out of it and I need to know what else to do with it. GA was a breeze on this article, but I’ve had some struggles on anything higher.
Thanks, mftp dan oops 15:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Octave
A few comments on referencing:
- Make sure your p.s and pp.s aren’t muddled in sfns. p. is for single pages, pp. is for multiple.
- Also check for hyphens for page ranges; these should be dashes
- Use of archive links is not consistent, suggest running IA Bot or taking a trip to the Wayback Machine
- Inconsistent use of publisher parameter for magazine sources
- Inconsistent reference title casing, suggest standardising to title or sentence per WP:CITESTYLE
- What makes Vice (Noisey) a “high-quality reliable source?”
- How do we know ref 53 is not copyright infringement?
- ISSN use inconsistent
Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 00:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you UpTheOctave! I will address these tonight once I am home from work. Regarding the Mohr interview, it entirely could be copyvio without me being aware of it, I took it at the suggestion of the Russian Wikipedia’s example. Admittedly, I was not sure how to format that one, though I am sure it is reliable. As for Noisey, it was an online music imprint of Vice, a print magazine with editorial oversight. If the latter is the case, I find it unlikely the case should be any different with Noisey. mftp dan oops 13:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
