Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease: Difference between revisions

Line 92: Line 92:

::The AfD has since closed as a Keep, so I suspect the IP hasn’t bothered to [[WP:Articles for deletion/Erika Kirk|read it]] and is coming here from some sort of right-wing news article written by someone with an axe to grind and no interest in giving their readers anything resembling accurate information that makes the reporter look like a fool. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jéské Couriano]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^&lowbar;^v]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]] 15:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

:[[File:Pictogram voting delete.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] ”’Not done”'<!– Template:RFPP#notd –>. The article isn’t protected. I won’t assume anything about what the OP meant other than what the OP requested. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] ([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]]) 17:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

=== [[Latvia]] ===

* {{pagelinks|Latvia}}

”’Reason:”’ The revert incident has ended 3 years ago, plus this country isn’t really controversial right now. [[User:DetectiveClarinet15|DetectiveClarinet15]] ([[User talk:DetectiveClarinet15|talk]]) 17:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Before posting a request to this page, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page’s edit history and click on the “View logs for this page” link (located underneath the page’s title). The protecting administrator will be listed in the protection log entry and next to the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select “Protection log” or “Pending changes log” to filter the logs accordingly.
Requests to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection and be added to this page and without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
Requests for removing creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) are generally handled after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
If you want to request uncontroversial changes to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article’s talk page and include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterwards. If the talk page is protected, preventing you from adding the request to that location, please use the section below to add an edit request.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it’s been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT. Deceased admin. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Deceased admin” is an invalid reason to unprotect. So is the rationale “no vandalism since protection”, which appears a lot on this page. Arguing “similar articles have been unprotected with no issue” is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Got anything else? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT. Deceased admin. Similar films have been unprotected with no major issues. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT. Deceased admin. Similar films have been unprotected with no major issues. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT. Deceased admin. Similar films have been unprotected with no major issues. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT. Deceased admin. Similar films have been unprotected with no major issues. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected nearly 8 years ago, when this video game was yet to be released and therefore a subject of speculation, leading to frequent unsourced content additions. Could be time to WP:TRYUNPROT given the length of protection and that the issue leading to it may be stale, seeing as the game was released a while back. Protecting admin is no longer active. Entranced98 (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT – protected for over 10 years with a rather low rate of vandalism prior to this. Protecting admin is sadly deceased. Entranced98 (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: WP:TRYUNPROT – protected for nearly 15 years due to subtle vandalism, might be worth dropping to PC to check if the problem has passed. Protecting admin is no longer active. Entranced98 (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of pending changes protection: The article is now under indefinite semi-protection, so pending changes protection is redundant. BriDash9000 (talk) 07:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As CEO and Board Chair of Turning Point, a Wikipedia page needs to remain! 172.248.167.24 (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Erika Kirk? Babysharkb☩ss2 ^(DEADMAU5) 15:49, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD has since closed as a Keep, so I suspect the IP hasn’t bothered to read it and is coming here from some sort of right-wing news article written by someone with an axe to grind and no interest in giving their readers anything resembling accurate information that makes the reporter look like a fool. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 15:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The article isn’t protected. I won’t assume anything about what the OP meant other than what the OP requested. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The revert incident has ended 3 years ago, plus this country isn’t really controversial right now. DetectiveClarinet15 (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply