Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Indefinite semi-protection: User request + Bot template in userspace. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:31, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not seeing any disruption. What’s the reason, then? Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Past disruption in these templates by an LTA. See User:TenshiBot/AfC review notification for example. That and its a substed template that is to be used across 50+ pages. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring behaviour from TA user. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 22:38, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article’s talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring behaviour from TA user. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 22:38, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article’s talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lot of conflicting edits due to the actor’s death. Dwight4186 (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biography articles are normally very busy after the person dies, but being busy is not in and of itself grounds for protection. Could you please briefly explain (or show) the nature of the disruption, if any? Left guide (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: So nobody else would edit it by me. Ryanreactionz (talk) 01:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It is not possible to protect a page so that only one user can edit it. See WP:UPROT. – The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Epstein is in the news again, and a couple of IPs are acting up. This is a contentious topic article. V. S. Video (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Most TA edits recently appear good-faith. – The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from TA user and low-activity user. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss with the other user on the talk page to establish consensus regarding the disputed content. – The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:38, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:02, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:35, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. WP:ARBPIA RaschenTechner (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]