Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

 

Line 73: Line 73:

* {{pagelinks|Chinese language}}

* {{pagelinks|Chinese language}}

”’Indefinite semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. Requesting indef protection due to high visibility. [[User:RaschenTechner|RaschenTechner]] ([[User talk:RaschenTechner|talk]]) 00:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

”’Indefinite semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. Requesting indef protection due to high visibility. [[User:RaschenTechner|RaschenTechner]] ([[User talk:RaschenTechner|talk]]) 00:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

=== [[:Reyhna Malhotra]] ===

* {{pagelinks|1=Reyhna Malhotra}}

”’Semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. ”'[[User:Zackmann08|<span style=”color:#00d5ff”>Zack</span><span style=”color:#007F94″>mann</span>]]”’ (^{[[User_talk:Zackmann08|Talk to me]]}/_{[[Special:Contributions/Zackmann08|<span style=”color:orange”>What I been doing</span>]]}) 00:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent copyvio. Copyrighted episode summaries have been copied onto this page by TAs six times in the last three weeks. MCE89 (talk) 04:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing by the TA-hopping sock farm. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:47, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An anonymous user with a dynamic IP is waging an edit war over their personal understanding of which games are considered core series, despite the creators’ clear position in the sources. Solaire the knight (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting indef semi-protection: This BLP article has been facing persistent IP vandalism for years now. Looking at the edit history, it’s clear a lot of valuable editor time is wasted in constantly having to revert vandalism again and again. The page has already been temporarily semi-protected twice, however, the moment the protection expires, the vandalism just resumes. I really don’t think anything other than indef semi-protection is going to solve this. — EarthDude (Talk) 09:33, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism edits by Temporary Accounts. Gunther :  Talk  10:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent alteration of lead & short description against apparent consensus / edit warring by new account. AukusRuckus (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism/BLP violations. TarnishedPath^talk 12:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and edit wars ~2025-43422-12 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article may need page protection from non-extended confirmed users. A vandalism-prone user has repeatedly reverted sourced content without engaging in content-based discussion. Despite multiple attempts to discuss the sources and material, they have declined to do so.

Instead, their comments focus on personal allegations against several long-standing editors, accusing them of involvement in visa-related scams in Thailand, without providing any evidence or addressing the article’s sources or content. They should have commented on the sources or the content, but instead their only comment was that “the editors are scammers from a visa center.” See also Talk:Phuket Gazette. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The level of vandalism/disruptive editing this article has experienced is too high for PC—productive edits from non-auto confirmed editors happen are a rare sight. Indefinite is recommended because this has a problem for many years, and I think the current protection level is one of the reasons why this hasn’t been scrutinized. @Daniel Case: Giovanni Potage (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are back right after protection ended. ^{Dieter Lloyd Wexler} 22:02, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/PIA. Isi96 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA nonsense. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite semi-protection;
IP and temp users have been replacing the entire article with contents from another one that’s completely unrelated. The first replacement was on 30 April 2025 & the latest on 28 November 2025. This article has also been protected for vandalism two times ever since. Rextroni07 (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Requesting indef protection due to high visibility. RaschenTechner (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]