Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと: Difference between revisions

 

Line 29: Line 29:

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====

:<small>”Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].”</small>

:<small>”Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].”</small>

⚫

Requested CU; sleepers are fairly common. [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 02:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Requested CU; sleepers are fairly common. [[User:45dogs|45dogs]] <small> (they/them) [[User talk:45dogs|(talk page)]]</small> 02:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

⚫

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

This case‘s socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Obvious. Already blocked, but CU for sleepers since accounts are usually created en masse. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 04:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added three more. All created today. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 04:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

---

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

See here. tony 02:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I’m looking, there’s an unusual amount of recently created users in the last few hours with similar names to the ones listed above — it might be worth checkuser to see if it can catch any potential sleepers? tony 02:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Requested CU; sleepers are fairly common. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 02:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---