Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edibiz: Difference between revisions

 

Line 20: Line 20:

*:Thanks, Jeraxmoira. I don’t think either of those are exonerating. Whoever checks this, could you please check {{socklist|1=DesiMoore|2=Macholi}} as well? Rationale for DesiMoore is the clearly incorrect keep argument (arguing that obviously paid sources are reliable and not paid), rationale for Macholi is the completely nonsensical keep argument. These two are different enough that they’re more likely to be MEAT, though. ”'[[User:Toadspike|<span style=”color:#21a81e;font-variant:small-caps”>Toadspike</span>]] [[User talk:Toadspike|<span style=”color:#21a81e;font-variant:small-caps”>[Talk]</span>]]”’ 08:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

*:Thanks, Jeraxmoira. I don’t think either of those are exonerating. Whoever checks this, could you please check {{socklist|1=DesiMoore|2=Macholi}} as well? Rationale for DesiMoore is the clearly incorrect keep argument (arguing that obviously paid sources are reliable and not paid), rationale for Macholi is the completely nonsensical keep argument. These two are different enough that they’re more likely to be MEAT, though. ”'[[User:Toadspike|<span style=”color:#21a81e;font-variant:small-caps”>Toadspike</span>]] [[User talk:Toadspike|<span style=”color:#21a81e;font-variant:small-caps”>[Talk]</span>]]”’ 08:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

* {{np|Antonio Ousman}} is confirmed to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amalgoni]]. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 15:59, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

* {{np|Antonio Ousman}} is confirmed to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amalgoni]]. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 15:59, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

* {{np|Antonio Ousman}} is {{possible}} to {{np|Chippla360}}. 16:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>

– A checkuser is in the process of checking relevant users.

They might not be from the same region, but it’s clearly a UPE farm working to keep Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royalnasty.

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk – Edibiz signs as BusyEditor, Antonio Ousman signs as Añtonīo. I support checks on Edibiz and Sandycubs for bizarre “keep” rationales, Chippla360 for closing the AfD [1], and Antonio Ousman as the primary author of Royalnasty. @Jeraxmoira, any reason you didn’t include others like DesiMoore and Macholi? Toadspike [Talk] 07:56, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, Jeraxmoira. I don’t think either of those are exonerating. Whoever checks this, could you please check as well? Rationale for DesiMoore is the clearly incorrect keep argument (arguing that obviously paid sources are reliable and not paid), rationale for Macholi is the completely nonsensical keep argument. These two are different enough that they’re more likely to be MEAT, though. Toadspike [Talk] 08:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Antonio Ousman is confirmed to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amalgoni. PhilKnight (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Antonio Ousman is  Possible to Chippla360. 16:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---