Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Royge 12: Difference between revisions

21 December 2025

– This SPI case is new and awaits sorting.

Suspected sockpuppets

Logged out accounts whose edit history is almost exclusively to the Luc Besson page and Royge 12’s talk page, always either enforcing or defending Royge’s preferred edits. Between all four accounts there is exactly one edit that does not fit those criteria. Diffs for the complete edit history of all four accounts:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11] Goweegie2 (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goweegie2,

Your accusations of using sockpuppet accounts are completely unfounded. I am using only my own account, and my contributions are clearly identifiable.

However, your aggressive behavior and refusal to engage in dialogue are becoming problematic. I have explained at length on the Luc Besson talk page (which I encourage readers to consult) why the original title accurately summarizes the section’s content, which primarily deals with the judicial process and its outcome, not just the existence of allegations.

From the beginning, you have refused to provide any counter-arguments or even attempt a discussion to reach a consensus. I now note that you are attempting to have me blocked in order to impose your title, instead of participating in the search for an agreement.

I invite other readers of this message to consult the Luc Besson talk page, where a constructive debate is already ongoing with another user. I have reminded you multiple times that, since there is a disagreement and you are proposing a new title, you must first discuss it to try to reach a consensus, rather than entering an edit war and trying to forcibly change the original text. Royge 12 (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments